DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeHonda
ForesterModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
178 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
184 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4460 mmLength3950 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1595 mmHeight1750 mm
1440 KgWeight1330 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Subaru Forester and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…