DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Sm-x vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSubaru
Sm-xModelForester
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeCrossover
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
186 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1750 mmHeight1595 mm
1330 KgWeight1440 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Sm-x and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…