2013 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
2013 Volvo V70 vs 2013 SsangYong Rexton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • SsangYong
Rexton
SsangYong Rexton 2013Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Rexton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
VolvoMakeSsangYong
V70ModelRexton
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/75 R16; 255/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
4823 mmLength4755 mm
—Width1900 mm
1547 mmHeight1785-1840 mm
1567 KgWeight1901-1965 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V70 and 2013 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…