DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 SsangYong Rexton vs 2013 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
RextonModelV60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,6 s
173 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
155 HPPower181 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
78 ltFuel tank67 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/75 R16; 255/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4755 mmLength4635 mm
1900 mmWidth1899 mm
1785-1840 mmHeight1484 mm
1901-1965 KgWeight—
2835 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 SsangYong Rexton and 2013 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…