DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Rexton vs 2003 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolkswagen
RextonModelPassat
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
170 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2324 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
209 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4683 mm
1870 mmWidth1746 mm
1760 mmHeight1498 mm
1815 KgWeight1590 Kg
2828 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Rexton and 2003 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…