DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2003 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSsangYong
GalantModelRexton
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
225 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4720 mm
—Width1870 mm
—Height1760 mm
—Weight1815 Kg
—Wheelbase2828 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Galant and 2003 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…