DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Rexton vs 2003 Saab 9-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeSaab
RextonModel9-5
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,4 s
170 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
143 HPPower185 HP
209 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,7 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4827 mm
1870 mmWidth1792 mm
1760 mmHeight1475 mm
1815 KgWeight1715 Kg
2828 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Rexton and 2003 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…