DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 SsangYong Musso vs 2004 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeNissan
MussoModelMurano
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
220 HPPower248 HP
310 NmTorque333 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
13,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
14,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
235/75 R15 HTyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4765 mm
1905 mmWidth1880 mm
1735 mmHeight1690 mm
1855 KgWeight1588 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 SsangYong Musso and 2004 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…