DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Musso vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
MussoModelV50
2003Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
129 HPPower140 HP
250 NmTorque220 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4522 mm
1864 mmWidth1845 mm
1735 mmHeight1457 mm
1850 KgWeight1335 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Musso and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…