DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2003 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
V50ModelMusso
2004Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
140 HPPower129 HP
220 NmTorque250 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
—Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4640 mm
1845 mmWidth1864 mm
1457 mmHeight1735 mm
1335 KgWeight1850 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2003 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…