DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Musso vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

49.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGAZ
MussoModel31
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

19,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
143 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2299 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
101 HPPower95 HP
205 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4870 mm
1864 mmWidth1800 mm
1735 mmHeight1422 mm
1795 KgWeight1560 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Musso and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…