DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

49.25–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeSsangYong
31ModelMusso
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
156 km/hTop speed143 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
95 HPPower101 HP
200 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength4640 mm
1800 mmWidth1864 mm
1576 mmHeight1735 mm
1540 KgWeight1795 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…