DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 SsangYong Musso vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMazda
MussoModelCronos
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

175 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2299 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
220 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,3 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 STyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4695 mm
1905 mmWidth1770 mm
1735 mmHeight1400 mm
1890 KgWeight1220 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 SsangYong Musso and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…