DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Eunos 500 vs 1996 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSsangYong
Eunos 500ModelMusso
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

205 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
180 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption14,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size235/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4545 mmLength4640 mm
1695 mmWidth1905 mm
1350 mmHeight1735 mm
1200 KgWeight1890 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Eunos 500 and 1996 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…