DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 SsangYong Musso vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeRenault
MussoModelScenic
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
176 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
204 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4168 mm
1864 mmWidth1719 mm
1735 mmHeight1609 mm
1895 KgWeight1290 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 SsangYong Musso and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…