DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeSsangYong
31ModelMusso
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
163 km/hTop speed176 km/h
2287 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
131 HPPower140 HP
188 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4960 mmLength4640 mm
1800 mmWidth1864 mm
1422 mmHeight1735 mm
1450 KgWeight1895 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…