DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 SsangYong Musso vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeGAZ
MussoModel31
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
176 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2287 cc
140 HPPower131 HP
204 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4960 mm
1864 mmWidth1800 mm
1735 mmHeight1422 mm
1895 KgWeight1450 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 SsangYong Musso and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…