DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Smart Roadster vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeAudi
RoadsterModelA3
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
220 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
170 HPPower125 HP
220 NmTorque173 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/40 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength4152 mm
1615 mmWidth1735 mm
1192 mmHeight1427 mm
840 KgWeight1160 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Smart Roadster and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…