DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeSmart
A3ModelRoadster
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
202 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
125 HPPower170 HP
173 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4152 mmLength3427 mm
1735 mmWidth1615 mm
1427 mmHeight1192 mm
1160 KgWeight840 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…