DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Roadster vs 2010 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeVolkswagen
RoadsterModelPolo
2005Model year2010
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
180 km/hTop speed177 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
130 NmTorque160 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength3987 mm
1615 mmWidth1698 mm
1207 mmHeight1488 mm
815 KgWeight1165 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2469 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Roadster and 2010 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…