DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Polo vs 2005 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeSmart
PoloModelRoadster
2010Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement698 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
160 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3987 mmLength3427 mm
1698 mmWidth1615 mm
1488 mmHeight1207 mm
1165 KgWeight815 Kg
2469 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Polo and 2005 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…