DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Perodua Kenari vs 2004 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeSmart
KenariModelRoadster
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
140 km/hTop speed160 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement698 cc
56 HPPower61 HP
88 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/65 R13Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3427 mm
1475 mmWidth1615 mm
1665 mmHeight1207 mm
845 KgWeight790 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Perodua Kenari and 2004 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…