DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Roadster vs 2009 Chevrolet Spark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeChevrolet
RoadsterModelSpark
2004Model year2009
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
160 km/hTop speed144 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement796 cc
61 HPPower52 HP
95 NmTorque69 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank38 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size145/70 R13; 155/65 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength3495 mm
1615 mmWidth1495 mm
1207 mmHeight1485 mm
790 KgWeight776 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Roadster and 2009 Chevrolet Spark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…