DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Smart Fortwo vs 2011 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeRenault
FortwoModelClio
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
155 km/hTop speed183 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
98 HPPower101 HP
140 NmTorque145 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/50R16V; 225/35 R17Tyre size185/60 R15; 195/50 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2695 mmLength4032 mm
1559 mmWidth1720 mm
1542 mmHeight1497 mm
780 KgWeight1186 Kg
1867 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Smart Fortwo and 2011 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…