DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Renault Clio vs 2011 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSmart
ClioModelFortwo
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
183 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement999 cc
101 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank33 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15; 195/50 R16 VTyre size175/50R16V; 225/35 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4032 mmLength2695 mm
1720 mmWidth1559 mm
1497 mmHeight1542 mm
1186 KgWeight780 Kg
—Wheelbase1867 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Renault Clio and 2011 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…