DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolvo
4 SerisiModelXC90
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
230 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
184 HPPower190 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank71 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4950 mm
1825 mmWidth—
1384 mmHeight1776 mm
1700 KgWeight—
2810 mmWheelbase2984 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…