DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeSkoda
4 SerisiModelOctavia
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
230 km/hTop speed248 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
184 HPPower220 HP
270 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4685 mm
1825 mmWidth1814 mm
1384 mmHeight1449 mm
1700 KgWeight1425 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…