DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeFord
4 SerisiModelTaurus
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
184 HPPower240 HP
270 NmTorque366 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank72 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 SelectShift
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size255/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength5154 mm
1825 mmWidth1935 mm
1384 mmHeight1542 mm
1700 KgWeight1798 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…