DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeFord
4 SerisiModelGalaxy
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
230 km/hTop speed222 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
184 HPPower240 HP
270 NmTorque345 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4848 mm
1825 mmWidth1916 mm
1384 mmHeight1747 mm
1700 KgWeight1658 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2849 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…