DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Smart Fortwo vs 2004 Daewoo Matiz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeDaewoo
FortwoModelMatiz
2007Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
2Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
145 km/hTop speed152 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement995 cc
61 HPPower64 HP
0 NmTorque87 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank38 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/60 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2695 mmLength3495 mm
1559 mmWidth1495 mm
1542 mmHeight1485 mm
750 KgWeight826 Kg
1867 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Smart Fortwo and 2004 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…