DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Matiz vs 2007 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSmart
MatizModelFortwo
2004Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
152 km/hTop speed145 km/h
995 ccEngine displacement999 cc
64 HPPower61 HP
87 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank33 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/60 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength2695 mm
1495 mmWidth1559 mm
1485 mmHeight1542 mm
826 KgWeight750 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase1867 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Matiz and 2007 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…