DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Smart Fortwo vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeRenault
FortwoModelClio
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed182 km/h
898 ccEngine displacement898 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque140 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 TwinamicGears5
185/50 R 16; 205/40 R 17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

2740 mmLength4267 mm
1663 mmWidth1732 mm
1543 mmHeight1475 mm
1040 KgWeight1055 Kg
1873 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Smart Fortwo and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…