2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.0 EcoBoost (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Smart Fortwo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.9 (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
FordMakeSmart
MondeoModelFortwo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
12,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement898 cc
125 HPPower109 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6 Twinamic
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size185/50 R 16; 205/40 R 17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSmart Fortwo
4871 mmLength2740 mm
1852 mmWidth1663 mm
1482 mmHeight1543 mm
1455 KgWeight1040 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase1873 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…