2016 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.9 (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Smart Fortwo vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.0 EcoBoost (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Smart Fortwo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationFord Mondeo
SmartMakeFord
FortwoModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationFord Mondeo
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
165 km/hTop speed200 km/h
898 ccEngine displacement998 cc
109 HPPower125 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationFord Mondeo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 TwinamicGears6
185/50 R 16; 205/40 R 17Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationFord Mondeo
2740 mmLength4871 mm
1663 mmWidth1852 mm
1543 mmHeight1482 mm
1040 KgWeight1455 Kg
1873 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Smart Fortwo and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…