2013 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.8 cdi (45 Hp) 2013Overall Score55.5/100
2013 Smart Fortwo vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.3 JTDM (85 Hp) 2013Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo MiTo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
SmartMakeAlfa Romeo
FortwoModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats4/5
2Doors3
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
135 km/hTop speed174 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
45 HPPower85 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
33 ltFuel tank45 lt
3,4 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption2,9 lt
3,3 ltAverage consumption3,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/60 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
2695 mmLength4063 mm
1559 mmWidth1720 mm
1542 mmHeight1446 mm
780 KgWeight1150 Kg
1867 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Smart Fortwo and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…