DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs 2013 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeSmart
MiToModelFortwo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement799 cc
85 HPPower45 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank33 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption3,4 lt
2,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
3,5 ltAverage consumption3,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16Tyre size155/60 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4063 mmLength2695 mm
1720 mmWidth1559 mm
1446 mmHeight1542 mm
1150 KgWeight780 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase1867 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo and 2013 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…