DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Smart Fortwo vs 2005 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSmart
FortwoModelRoadster
2002Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
150 km/hTop speed160 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement698 cc
75 HPPower61 HP
110 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/50 R16; 205/45 R16Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3427 mm
1515 mmWidth1615 mm
1549 mmHeight1207 mm
805 KgWeight790 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Smart Fortwo and 2005 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…