DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Roadster vs 2002 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeSmart
RoadsterModelFortwo
2005Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats2
2Doors3

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
160 km/hTop speed150 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement698 cc
61 HPPower75 HP
95 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank33 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size175/50 R16; 205/45 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength2500 mm
1615 mmWidth1515 mm
1207 mmHeight1549 mm
790 KgWeight805 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Roadster and 2002 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…