2005 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.7 i (61 Hp) 2005Overall Score42.5/100
2005 Smart Fortwo vs 2004 Chevrolet Celta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Celta
Chevrolet Celta 1.0 i 16V (60 Hp) 2004Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Celta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
SmartMakeChevrolet
FortwoModelCelta
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
2Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
15,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
135 km/hTop speed151 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement999 cc
61 HPPower60 HP
95 NmTorque81 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size145/80 R13T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationChevrolet Celta
2500 mmLength3748 mm
1515 mmWidth1608 mm
1549 mmHeight1429 mm
805 KgWeight834 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Smart Fortwo and 2004 Chevrolet Celta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Celta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…