DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Celta vs 2005 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Celta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeSmart
CeltaModelFortwo
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
3Doors3

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
151 km/hTop speed135 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement698 cc
60 HPPower61 HP
81 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank33 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
145/80 R13TTyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3748 mmLength2500 mm
1608 mmWidth1515 mm
1429 mmHeight1549 mm
834 KgWeight805 Kg
2443 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Celta and 2005 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Celta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…