1999 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.7 i (50 Hp) 1999Overall Score38.5/100
1999 Smart Fortwo vs 2002 Perodua Nippa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Perodua
Nippa
Perodua Nippa 0.7 (31 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Perodua Nippa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart FortwoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
SmartMakePerodua
FortwoModelNippa
1999Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Smart FortwoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
18,3 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
135 km/hTop speed132 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement659 cc
50 HPPower31 HP
80 NmTorque49 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart FortwoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank32 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart FortwoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart FortwoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
2500 mmLength3395 mm
1515 mmWidth1395 mm
1549 mmHeight1410 mm
805 KgWeight650 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Smart Fortwo and 2002 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Perodua Nippa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…