DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Matiz vs 1999 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSmart
MatizModelFortwo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
144 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement698 cc
52 HPPower50 HP
69 NmTorque80 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank33 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
145/70 R13Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength2500 mm
1495 mmWidth1515 mm
1480 mmHeight1549 mm
725 KgWeight805 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Matiz and 1999 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…