DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Forfour vs 2005 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeVolkswagen
ForfourModelPolo
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
180 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
95 HPPower101 HP
210 NmTorque126 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3743 mm
1684 mmWidth1632 mm
1450 mmHeight1418 mm
965 KgWeight925 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Forfour and 2005 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…