DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Suzuki Swift vs 2005 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Swift

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeSmart
SwiftModelForfour
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
102 HPPower95 HP
133 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3695 mmLength3752 mm
1690 mmWidth1684 mm
1500 mmHeight1450 mm
1010 KgWeight965 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Suzuki Swift and 2005 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Swift leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…