DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Smart Forfour vs 2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeChery
ForfourModelSweet (QQ)
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
158 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
64 HPPower53 HP
92 NmTorque83 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3752 mmLength3550 mm
1684 mmWidth1508 mm
1450 mmHeight1491 mm
965 KgWeight850 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Smart Forfour and 2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…