DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2006 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeSmart
Sweet (QQ)ModelForfour
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
140 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
53 HPPower64 HP
83 NmTorque92 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3752 mm
1508 mmWidth1684 mm
1491 mmHeight1450 mm
850 KgWeight965 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2006 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…