DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Smart Forfour vs 2005 Toyota Belta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Belta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeToyota
ForfourModelBelta
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
64 HPPower86 HP
92 NmTorque124 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3752 mmLength4300 mm
1684 mmWidth1895 mm
1450 mmHeight1460 mm
965 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Smart Forfour and 2005 Toyota Belta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Belta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…