DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Perodua Kenari vs 2005 Smart Forfour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeSmart
KenariModelForfour
2005Model year2005
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
140 km/hTop speed158 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
56 HPPower64 HP
88 NmTorque92 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3460 mmLength3752 mm
1475 mmWidth1684 mm
1665 mmHeight1450 mm
845 KgWeight965 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Perodua Kenari and 2005 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…