DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Smart Forfour vs 2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeChery
ForfourModelSweet (QQ)
2014Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,9 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
151 km/hTop speed140 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1051 cc
71 HPPower53 HP
91 NmTorque83 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
28 ltFuel tank0 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R 15; 185/60 R 15Tyre size155/65 R13; 175/60 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3495 mmLength3550 mm
1665 mmWidth1508 mm
1554 mmHeight1491 mm
900 KgWeight850 Kg
2494 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Smart Forfour and 2013 Chery Sweet (QQ) approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…