2014 • Tata
Nano
Tata Nano 0.6 (38 Hp) 2014Overall Score46.5/100
2014 Tata Nano vs 2014 Smart Forfour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Smart
Forfour
Smart Forfour 1.0 (71 Hp) 2014Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Tata Nano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tata NanoSpecificationSmart Forfour
TataMakeSmart
NanoModelForfour
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors5
Performance
Tata NanoSpecificationSmart Forfour
12,6 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
105 km/hTop speed151 km/h
624 ccEngine displacement999 cc
38 HPPower71 HP
51 NmTorque91 Nm
2Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Tata NanoSpecificationSmart Forfour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
24 ltFuel tank28 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tata NanoSpecificationSmart Forfour
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
135/70 R12; 155/65 R12Tyre size165/65 R 15; 185/60 R 15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Tata NanoSpecificationSmart Forfour
3164 mmLength3495 mm
1750 mmWidth1665 mm
1652 mmHeight1554 mm
695 KgWeight900 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2494 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Tata Nano and 2014 Smart Forfour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Nano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…